Thursday, September 30, 2010

That American Gangster !!

The pictures are Courtesy of Smith's Collection.
Open-range ranching was seasonal, like agricultural work. There were four annual phases to the cowboy's back-breaking job: the spring roundup, the trail drive, the fall roundup, and winter work. To fully document all aspects of this cycle, Smith had to be on the scene throughout the year, especially during the spring and fall roundups when so much activity took place.

The best photographic opportunities were during the roundups, and Smith was there at the appointed time. The cattle were allowed to graze freely throughout the winter, but in the spring they were gathered together and sorted by ranches. The spring roundup would last as long as thirty-five days. The process included cutting out, or separating, individual calves for branding, castration, and dehorning, then cutting out mature steers (or beeves) to be driven to market. Strays were cut out and returned to their ranges by the "stray man" that would travel from outfit to outfit. The remaining cattle were then returned to their own ranges. Fall roundups were similar, except that mature cattle would not be taken to market.

Right before the trail drive, the cowhands often branded the cattle. They would build a wooden chute and run a string of cattle through it, applying the brands through the chute slats. But not all cattle were branded during a roundup. Some were missed and, while unbranded, were considered mavericks that could be claimed by any outfit. When these unbranded animals were discovered, the cowboys had to brand them quickly with whatever implement was available. Smith documented the practice of branding on the open range with a branding iron made from a ring off of a cinch. Rather than stamping the iron down flat on the hide, as one would normally do, the cowhand created the brand by simply drawing the mark with the hot edge of the ring.
Right before the trail drive, the cowhands often branded the cattle. They would build a wooden chute and run a string of cattle through it, applying the brands through the chute slats. But not all cattle were branded during a roundup. Some were missed and, while unbranded, were considered mavericks that could be claimed by any outfit. When these unbranded animals were discovered, the cowboys had to brand them quickly with whatever implement was available. Smith documented the practice of branding on the open range with a branding iron made from a ring off of a cinch. Rather than stamping the iron down flat on the hide, as one would normally do, the cowhand created the brand by simply drawing the mark with the hot edge of the ring.

The chuck wagon was an ordinary supply wagon that had been altered by the addition of a chuck box on the back. The first wagon alteration was made by Charles Goodnight, the famous "Cattle King" of the JA Ranch in the Palo Duro Canyon. The box was stocked with food and utensils, and the wagon carried the pots and pans, medicine, tools, weapons, and bedrolls for the whole outfit. Kindling was stored underneath the wagon, and a water barrel was attached to the side. A hinged lid folded out from the wagon into a table, which the cook used as a countertop.

The chuck wagon was the center of the outfit's world. Not only was it the vehicle that transported most of their gear and all their food, it also provided shade. A tarp was often pulled out from the back of the wagon and supported by poles. Because it was such an important area of activity, the chuck wagon appears in many of Smith's images, even when it was not the primary subject
Derived from the Spanish word for "relay of horses," the remuda was the large herd of extra horses that accompanied an outfit during the roundups and trail drives. Each cowboy had a string of six or more cowponies he could use. When they were not being ridden, the horses were penned in a rope corral. The horse wrangler monitored the remuda and would have fresh mounts ready for the cowboys in the morning, at noon, and in the evening for night herding.
Most range bosses laid cowhands off in the winter, telling them to come back in the spring. But the good workers and men with families were sometimes kept on to help with winter work, which consisted of holding cattle on a particular area of the range for the season. Cowhands who were hired on to do this work lived in a line camp. Sometimes cattle would have to be fed hay or feed while they were on winter ground. If so, the cowhand was called a "feeder" or "hay shoveler." He was responsible for riding the fence line and making sure that the cows were staying on their side. He also made sure that the fence was in good repair. If windmills were on the range, then repairing them was also his responsibility, for a herd could not last long without water.

While Smith did most of his photography during the peak times of activity, he was able to capture typical winter scenes on more than one occasion. In 1906, while visiting his cousin's ranch, he was surprised by the severe weather of a "blue norther." He took the opportunity to secure photographs of cattle seeking shelter on an ice-covered prairie and a lone fence rider on patrol. At another time, he made several winter photographs at the Matador Ranch's line camp, which had originally served as the ranch's headquarters.
Information Courtesy of Ewrin E. Smith

My Six Story!

That was the last of Family.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Oregon Trail leads to Education …

  1. Play Oregon Trail. Discuss how gaming could potentially connect with learning.

Well gaming in 2010; majority of it is doing more influencing than educating. In my opinion, the only way I see a game educating anybody is if it's a guarantee and it is based off education. Oregon Trail though, definitely had a connection with educating who ever played it. It informed you on many things that I learned while playing it (was really hurting my eyes). Such as who made these trips out to Oregon, what were their positions, the difference between each, and their status level - their income, significance, etc. However, now in days most game counsels include nothing but negative influence on people and no type of educating. Where's the positive; nowhere to be found! Sad story, right?

Friday, September 17, 2010

The Reconstruction vs. Civil War Movement

In a sense both the Reconstruction and the Civil War Movement were pretty much the same. African-Americans were prohibted from having any type of authority or any where near it in a white man's eye. Even though the Reconstruction's main purpose - was for freedom of the slaves in the south but the slaves seem to keep the same status on the human specturm - "the inferior".

Click Here for the Source!

Here are a few examples of how they were treated that I found on several different websites:

African Americans during Reconstruction

The Emancipation Proclamation abolished the legal fact of slavery, but racial discrimination and segregation remained during the reconstruction era. Many things happened during the time of the Emancipation Proclamation and Reconstruction and it definitely did not do as much for the black people as everyone thought it would. The blacks became the forgotten people after the war and fell through the cracks of society, while people only looked on. Then the suddenness of the Emancipation left both the blacks and whites unprepared to deal with each other and their new status. Also, there was difficulty with legal discrimination and harsh imprisonment as blacks attempted to integrate themselves into a white society during a very overwhelming time.

After the war, the blacks fell through the cracks of the North and South. There was massive confusion regarding what people were really fighting for. The North was fighting to abolish slavery, whereas the South was fighting for their state's rights. The blacks were caught somewhere in the middle between right and wrong. As Abraham Lincoln introduced the Emancipation the Southerners were bitter and resented the sudde ...

They were sent away with no education and would soon learn that life could be a cruel game directed at them. They never had the option of being the winner. They were given the losers positioning right away. The blacks were vulnerable and the carpetbaggers were quick to take advantage of them. The carpetbaggers were cold-hearted people who would stop at nothing for a little money. "I was pretty hard up and I did not care who the candidate was if I go

With the end of the Civil War in 1865 African-Americans still had fewer rights than white people. Even with the passing of laws such as the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifthtenth amendments, which were aimed at giving
them equal protection under law, blacks were still discriminated against. Although under law African-Americans had equal rights they were still considered economically inferior to the whites and suffered from this position below them.

Click Here for the Source!


It was nearly impossible for a black farmer to be able to own and farm his own land because whites were given first priority. Union general Sherman promised the newly freed slaves forty acres and a mule to be able to farm by themselves. This land was taken away in August 1865 when President Johnson ordered the eviction of all former slaves and the land be given back to former slave holders(Danzer et all). To make up for this loss of land the President passed the Southern Homestead Act with set aside 44 million acres of land to be used by the former slaves. The problem was that this land was mainly swampy and it was unsuitable for farming. Also the former slaves did not have the resources such as seed, plows, tools, and horse to farm(Danzer et all).

Monday, September 13, 2010

"Educate the Slaves !!!" "The Who?"

The educating of slaves was very few to none. I found this out in my readings of The State of African Americans in the South "In 1915, South Carolina spent one-twelfth as much on the education of a black child as on a white child. In 1916, only 19 black youths were enrolled in public high schools in North Carolina and 310 were enrolled in Georgia." In 1900, the plight of African Americans in the South was bleak!
Well by the time I was done reading the article on The State of African Americans in the South. I was highly upset; heck I was Pissed !! I read this paragraph && was heated "At the beginning of the 20th century, some 44.5 percent of all African American adults were illiterate ..." Are kidding me ?? Well once again I notice it goes back to the superior and inferior thing which
is just absurdity in my opinion. But sadly 'til this day people think in such a way and it is just nonsense!
"Increasingly, African Americans in the South were subject to a degrading system of social segregation and deprived of the right to vote and other prerogatives of citizenship. This system of racial discrimination based on law and custom was called "Jim Crow," after a mid-19th century black-faced minstrel act. Beginning with Mississippi in 1890, every Southern state, except Kentucky and Tennessee, had disenfranchised the vast majority of its African American population by 1907 through the use of literacy tests and poll taxes." In this statement it pretty much answers your question in a lump sum.How were former slaves educated and what roadblocks did they encounter? They weren't educated & the list of roadblocks was everlasting from a degrading system of social segregation and deprived of the right to vote and other prerogatives of citizenship, to the absurd literacy tests and poll taxes; they surely didnt have any freedom which goes back to my readings of The Politics of Reconstruction One black army veteran asked rhetorically: "If you call this Freedom, what did you call Slavery?"
P.S. I'll leave it at that note. Now think !! Where they even educated in the first place?

Friday, September 10, 2010

Disbelief ...

Not too sure if this image was appropriate, but you teach us to excercise the truth and this is it right here in the "flesh". Lynyching - the obliterating of a human being. Most being African-American slaves but also a few of Italian, Chinese, or Jewish. Anyhow, I choose this image for several diffirent reasons. One being what I just stated in the last sentence, to excercise telling what is real. Also because it hit me deep to just read about lynching in the readings. Then to see a image of it; which was sent as a postcard. With comments such as "You missed a good time" or "This is the barbeque we had last night." Yes, they also cooked and sold the human bodies as souvenirs; Small pieces of bone went for 25 cents and a bit of liver, crisply cooked, for 10 cents. Furthemore the purpose of this was to show you the brutal things the slaves had to go through and also to inform you on just how cruel these humans were! It was very upsetting to read and see the happiness on so many faces - dealing with such atrocious behavior.
The Source: Click on The Picture

U.S.A = Stereotpical

I honestly think stereotypes are all over the World. It's really a World-wide thing because when it all comes down to the stereotype topic. It all begins with someones opinion. Which everybody has the right to in the United States of America. Futhermore the reason it is so widely in the U.S. is due to the fact of the great amount of immargration in the U.S. which brings opinions which most of the times disapproval; and that's what it pretty much is when you get down to the nitty gritty of it. So reason being for it being so widely in our society, th united States of America[iN Random Old mans voices] is this equation.

[Diviersity + Freedom = Seterotypes(a.k.a Disapproval)]

Thoreau's State of Mind

Well when Thoreau stated that --"that government is best which governs least". Well he is basically saying the people like it when the government is In-charge but doesn't over do the governing. To the point it drives the society into a fight to throw he or she over or out of office. or at least most people perfer a person of less dictatorship. Such as the Communist government; in which most cases the people living in a communist society HATE IT !!! To get more in-depth with it, it is the governments occupation to keep order but not to do it in such a way it turns into wanting to control the society "In every step they take" (also known as dictating). So pretty much just dont be a Control freak and ... Majority will always RULE !!

Thursday, September 09, 2010

History is a "Lifestyle"

I feel that Question #2 (Does history matter? Explain.) is a rhetorical one. Of course History matters. The World we know today revovles around history. It's been a Lifestyle since day ONE !! So yeah Most defiently H i S T O R Y Matters !!